Mobile biometrics technologies are nowadays the new frontier for secure use of data and services, and are considered particularly important due to the massive use of handheld devices in the entire world. Among the biometric traits with potential to be used in mobile settings, the iris/ocular region is a natural candidate, even considering that further advances in the technology are required to meet the operational requirements of such ambitious environments. Aiming at promoting these advances, we organized the Mobile Iris Challenge Evaluation (MICHE)-I contest. This paper presents a comparison of the performance of the participant methods by various Figures of Merit (FoMs). A particular attention is devoted to the identification of the image covariates that are likely to cause a decrease in the performance levels of the compared algorithms. Among these factors, interoperability among different devices plays an important role. The methods (or parts of them) implemented by the analyzed approaches are classified into seg- mentation (S), which was the main target of MICHE-I, and recognition (R). The paper reports both the results observed for either S or R, and also for different recombinations (S+R) of such methods. Last but not least, we also present the results obtained by multi-classifier strategies.

Insights into the results of MICHE I - Mobile Iris CHallenge Evaluation / De Marsico, Maria; Nappi, Michele; Narducci, Fabio; Proença, Hugo. - In: PATTERN RECOGNITION. - ISSN 0031-3203. - STAMPA. - 74:(2018), pp. 286-304. [10.1016/j.patcog.2017.08.028]

Insights into the results of MICHE I - Mobile Iris CHallenge Evaluation

De Marsico, Maria;
2018

Abstract

Mobile biometrics technologies are nowadays the new frontier for secure use of data and services, and are considered particularly important due to the massive use of handheld devices in the entire world. Among the biometric traits with potential to be used in mobile settings, the iris/ocular region is a natural candidate, even considering that further advances in the technology are required to meet the operational requirements of such ambitious environments. Aiming at promoting these advances, we organized the Mobile Iris Challenge Evaluation (MICHE)-I contest. This paper presents a comparison of the performance of the participant methods by various Figures of Merit (FoMs). A particular attention is devoted to the identification of the image covariates that are likely to cause a decrease in the performance levels of the compared algorithms. Among these factors, interoperability among different devices plays an important role. The methods (or parts of them) implemented by the analyzed approaches are classified into seg- mentation (S), which was the main target of MICHE-I, and recognition (R). The paper reports both the results observed for either S or R, and also for different recombinations (S+R) of such methods. Last but not least, we also present the results obtained by multi-classifier strategies.
2018
Biometric algorithm fusion; Evaluation; Mobile Iris Recognition; Software; Signal Processing; 1707; Artificial Intelligence
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Insights into the results of MICHE I - Mobile Iris CHallenge Evaluation / De Marsico, Maria; Nappi, Michele; Narducci, Fabio; Proença, Hugo. - In: PATTERN RECOGNITION. - ISSN 0031-3203. - STAMPA. - 74:(2018), pp. 286-304. [10.1016/j.patcog.2017.08.028]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
DeMarsico_Insights_2018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.8 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.8 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1073756
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 40
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 33
social impact